From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8492 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2013 04:30:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8417 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2013 04:30:29 -0000 From: "zeratul976 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 04:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zeratul976 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 --- Comment #2 from Nathan Ridge 2013-03-05 04:30:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this is > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#374 Ah, I see. The code is accepted if a declaration (without definition) of the specialization is placed in the namespace. Didn't realize that.