From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 825 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2013 23:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 795 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2013 23:49:45 -0000 From: "lichray at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 23:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: lichray at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg03087.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Zhihao Yuan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Zhihao Yuan --- (In reply to Nathan Ridge from comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I think this is > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#374 > > Ah, I see. The code is accepted if a declaration (without definition) of the > specialization is placed in the namespace. Didn't realize that. ?? That was the c++03 status, and the new wording ("or to a specialization thereof") relaxed this requirement. Has this been implemented?