From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-416588-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3927 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2013 11:00:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 3703 invoked by uid 48); 1 Mar 2013 11:00:21 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/56483] LTO issue with expanding GIMPLE_COND
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Keywords Last reconfirmed Component AssignedTo Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-56483-4-dd99p14mHz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56483

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |lto, missed-optimization
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-03-01
          Component|lto                         |middle-end
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-01 11:00:18 UTC ---
gimple_cond_single_var_p should be inlined at its single caller, it isn't
any good abstraction.

integer_zerop isn't a good enough test for what the single caller tries to
assert as far as I can see.  You'd need to test whether it's precision
is 1 as well (or whether it's BOOLEAN_TYPE).

The IR reader cannot be fixed (the middle-end shouldn't use
frontend boolean_*_node) - frontends have different representation for their
boolean_{true,false,type}_nodes.

Well.  Confirmed and mine.