From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2210 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2013 19:25:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 749 invoked by uid 48); 8 Mar 2013 19:24:29 -0000 From: "mark.d.rustad at intel dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/56574] False possibly uninitialized variable warning Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mark.d.rustad at intel dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00709.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56574 --- Comment #1 from Mark Rustad 2013-03-08 19:24:27 UTC --- It also appears that incorrect code is generated in cases where the warning is produced. That incorrect code was referencing the uninitialized value. So the warning is consistent with the code generated, but the code is wrong.