From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19754 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2013 08:35:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 11902 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2013 08:35:27 -0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56607] [4.8 regression] GCC fails to warn on division by zero Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01007.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56607 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-13 08:35:26 UTC --- Created attachment 29660 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29660 gcc48-pr56607.patch For the C++ warning regression, here is an untested fix, but wonder if we shouldn't defer it for 4.8.1.