From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-418840-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12176 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2013 20:08:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12094 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2013 20:08:23 -0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/56714] [4.9 regression] Bootstrap failure libitm/local_atomic:1580:3: error: always_inline function might not be inlinable
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 20:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56714-4-XEtzcGTgH8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56714-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg02281.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56714

--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-31 20:08:22 UTC ---
I guess it is really complaining about the lack of inline modifier.
  __attribute__((__always_inline__)) bool
  atomic_flag_test_and_set_explicit(atomic_flag* __a,
        memory_order __m) noexcept
  { return __a->test_and_set(__m); }

I think adding "inline" should do the trick?

Honza