From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26573 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2013 14:41:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26518 invoked by uid 48); 25 Mar 2013 14:41:10 -0000 From: "felix-gcc at fefe dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/56719] missed optimization: i > 0xffff || i*4 > 0xffff Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: felix-gcc at fefe dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01772.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56719 --- Comment #3 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de 2013-03-25 14:41:10 UTC --- @comment 1: maybe it's me but that does not make any sense. 3fff is wrong and the correct value is 3fff? Huh? @comment 2: I extracted this code from a piece of commercial production software compiled with gcc. Not sure where you draw the line but to me that makes it relevant :-)