From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21442 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2013 12:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21061 invoked by uid 48); 28 Mar 2013 12:42:52 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/56735] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist Read Error with question marks Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:42:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status CC AssignedTo Target Milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg02096.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-28 12:42:51 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Extensions-to-namelist.html for the description of the ? and =? extension. Actually, there are two bugs: a) With "?", no attempt is made to read the next item. That's a bug due to Jerry's patch for PR 47154 (http://gcc.gnu.org/r168502). Here, '?' was falling through to a "goto find_nml_name;" - but no longer after "case EOF:" was added. b) With "?", there is no output. Seemingly, a regression due to Janne's patch for PR 25561 (http://gcc.gnu.org/r135373). Here, a "if (!p)" got lost.