From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-418487-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14115 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2013 16:58:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13996 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2013 16:57:53 -0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/56743] Namelist bug with comment and no blank
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56743-4-ndj3eCv93M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56743-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01928.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-26 16:57:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 29734
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29734
Draft patch (only for read_integer)

Draft patch - fixes the issue of the test case, but one probably should do an
audit of the whole file (list_read). For instance, using REAL instead of
INTEGER in the test case also fails. One probably does not need to handle all
CASE_SEPARATORS, but presumably a large number of those.