From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-418710-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21031 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2013 00:21:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21004 invoked by uid 48); 29 Mar 2013 00:21:32 -0000
From: "w.shane.grant at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/56774] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] G++ 4.8 reverses variadic template types during unpacking
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 00:21:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: w.shane.grant at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56774-4-osUVhJLbQv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg02151.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774

--- Comment #4 from Shane <w.shane.grant at gmail dot com> 2013-03-29 00:21:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We badly need a reduced testcase not using the whole <tuple> (not to mention
> <iostream> of course)

Here's a more reduced test case.

template <class ... Args>
struct mytype {};

template <class T, class ... Args>
void something( mytype<T, Args...> )
{ }

int main()
{
  // Compiles OK in GCC 4.6.3 but NOT 4.8
  something<int, char, bool>( mytype<int, char, bool>() );

  // Compiles OK in GCC 4.8 but NOT 4.6.3
  something<int, bool, char>( mytype<int, char, bool>() );

  return 0;
}

I tried to make simpler cases using purely variadic templates (e.g. no class
T), but the issue only shows up when there is an individually named template
parameter as well as a variadic pack.  To get the error to show up it also
requires types that cannot be implicitly converted to each other.