[Bug target/56788] _mm_frcz_sd and _mm_frcz_ss ignore their second argument

["ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788

Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.4

--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
gcc follows Microsoft definition [1]:

__m128d _mm_frcz_ss (
   __m128 high,
   __m128 src
);

This should be the same as other "vm" (vector merge) instructions, for example
_mm_add_ss [2], also commented in gcc's xmmintrin.h:

/* Perform the respective operation on the lower SPFP (single-precision
   floating-point) values of A and B; the upper three SPFP values are
   passed through from A.  */

__m128 _mm_add_ss (__m128 __A, __m128 __B)
{
  return (__m128) __builtin_ia32_addss ((__v4sf)__A, (__v4sf)__B);
}

[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/gg445126%28v=vs.100%29.aspx
[2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/be94x2y6%28v=vs.90%29.aspx
>From gcc-bugs-return-435604-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Nov 23 09:20:58 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435604-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31628 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2013 09:20:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31596 invoked by uid 48); 23 Nov 2013 09:20:55 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/59228] ICE-on-invalid with assumed type and ASYNCHRONOUS
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 09:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-59228-4-qApu5i9T7T@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02381.txt.bz2
Content-length: 627

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY228

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk with r205304. Despite the fact that it might be viewed as a
regression, I don't think it's worth backporting to 4.8 (given that it's 'only'
ICE-on-invalid and was reported against trunk).

Closing as fixed. Thanks for the report!