From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16841 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2013 17:33:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16769 invoked by uid 48); 7 Apr 2013 17:33:13 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/56864] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0 Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 17:33:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00563.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-07 17:33:12 UTC --- > Neither r196686 nor r197531 are revisions on the trunk. Well, I record the revision number given by svn: Updated to revision xxxxxx The corresponding actual revision for trunk may be some number below, e.g., 197530 for 197531, or 196683 for 196686. If you know a simple way to get the last actual revision for trunk (branch), I'll be glad to use it. Note that between r197531 and r197541, the only changes I can find are r197533 and r197534. Both are supposed to have been tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00263.html and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00333.html), but may be not with -m32. Since there is no division in the test, I suspect that if there is a regression in the 197531 to 197541 range, it is likely r197533, hence CCed Steven.