From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24625 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2014 15:09:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24534 invoked by uid 55); 3 Feb 2014 15:09:04 -0000 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/56865] [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 --- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865 > > --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #19) > > This may be now fixed ... > > I believe it is! Nice work. I don't see vect-96.c failing anymore on r207423 > of trunk. The last spectester result we have is from 1/28 on r207160. Was the > intended fix committed between those two revisions? > > If the next spectester result confirms what I'm seeing, we should be able to > close this. Thanks for getting this working. Should be fixed as part of the side-effect of no longer adjusting DR order