From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 682 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2013 21:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 625 invoked by uid 48); 7 Apr 2013 21:10:04 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56868] Constexpr example in 7.1.5/5 fails to compile correctly Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-07 21:10:04 UTC --- Don't we have an old issue with folding happening too early in some cases? I'm wondering if this isn't just an example, but I can't quickly find that issue.