From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15850 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2013 17:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11806 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jul 2013 17:26:05 -0000 From: "xanclic at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:28:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: xanclic at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00841.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #13 from Max Reitz --- (In reply to Brooks Moses from comment #12) > Now, if this replacement still happens when you compile with -nostdlib, that > would be a bug since it becomes legal code in that case. But that's > somewhat of a separate issue and should be filed separately if it happens. > (We should arguably also have a test for it, if we don't already.) Actually, that's why I filed this report in the first place. The test case you request is in fact given in my OP.