From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-419923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12119 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2013 13:50:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12081 invoked by uid 48); 12 Apr 2013 13:50:30 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/56934] New: ICE folding a COND_EXPR involving vectors
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01068.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56934

             Bug #: 56934
           Summary: ICE folding a COND_EXPR involving vectors
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: glisse@gcc.gnu.org


typedef long veci __attribute__((vector_size(16)));
veci f(double a, veci b){
  return (a<2)?(b<3):(b!=b);
}

e.cc: In function 'veci f(double, veci)':
e.cc:3:27: internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1972
   return (a<2)?(b<3):(b!=b);
                           ^

I think the folding should just be disabled in this case. Even if fold_convert
was taught how to convert scalars to vectors, it would produce a vector {1,1}
instead of {-1,-1} (and it would build a TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR with vectors). I have
a fix as part of another patch.

An alternative fix would be to make truth_value_p return false for vectors,
which would make us regress on several optimizations I guess.