From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2009 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2013 14:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1975 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2013 14:30:29 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/56958] Spurious set but not used variable warning in empty pack expansion Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:30:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg02181.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56958 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-26 14:30:29 UTC --- I agree, looks like warning is fine...