[Bug target/57112] -march=x86-64 not documented

[Bug target/57112] -march=x86-64 not documented

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57112

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-04-29
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-29 12:59:28 UTC ---
Yes, I only learned about it from reading the sources.

[Bug target/57112] -march=x86-64 not documented

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57112

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2013-04-29 00:00:00         |2015-10-6

--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I just learned from it by googling! :(

If someone cared to explain it, I will add it to the FAQ (I can't send patches
ATM, sorry)
>From gcc-bugs-return-498895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Oct 06 19:18:26 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-498895-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56484 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2015 19:18:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 56439 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2015 19:18:21 -0000
From: "jonathan at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/67871] New: LTO falis for ARM big-endian
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 19:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: jonathan at codesourcery dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-67871-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2
Content-length: 636

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg871

            Bug ID: 67871
           Summary: LTO falis for ARM big-endian
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jonathan at codesourcery dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

$ touch empty.c
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc -mbig-endian -flto empty.c
/tmp/ccUtMyOv.o: file not recognized: File format is ambiguous
/tmp/ccUtMyOv.o: matching formats: elf32-bigarm elf32-big
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status