From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31733 invoked by alias); 7 May 2013 15:09:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31529 invoked by uid 55); 7 May 2013 15:09:04 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:09:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-05-07 15:09:04 UTC --- > --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2013-05-07 > 15:06:45 UTC --- >> But what's the justification for the relevant change, which wasn't >> posted to gcc-patches AFAICS? >> >> 2013-04-23 Eric Botcazou >> Pascal Obry >> >> * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (targ): Fix target name check. >> >> Having to deal with the target_alias instead of the canonical form found >> in target seems rather counterintuitive and fragile to me. > > The ChangeLog entry is misleading, neither Pascal nor I have anything to do > with the change. Yes, this is very fragile and has already caused various > issues. This seems to argue for reverting or at least reworking the change. I suppose I'll withhold my patch until it's decided how to proceed. Rainer