public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/57223] Auto-vectorization fails for nested multiple loops depending on type of array
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:23:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-57223-4-ctgSaImhi0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-57223-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57223

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Usishchev Yury from comment #3)
> I'm testing it on current trunk, and second loop is not vectorized both with
> floating point and integer types.
> For floating point types it is not vectorized due to control flow in loop:
> 
>  <bb 15>:
> // ...
> if (t_56 > _61)
>   goto <bb 16>;
> else
>   goto <bb 17>;
>  <bb 16>:
>  <bb 17>:
> # iftmp.2_7 = PHI <_61(16), t_56(15)>
> 
> This can be optimized to MIN_EXPR in phiopt pass, but is not because of NaNs:
> 
> tree-ssa-phiopt.c:876:
>   /* The optimization may be unsafe due to NaNs.  */
>   if (HONOR_NANS (TYPE_MODE (type)))
>     return false;
> 
> If compiled with -ffinite-math-only second loop still is not vectorised:
> 
> not_always_good.c:16:7: note: not vectorized: latch block not empty.
> 
> (same occurs with integer types). Latch block it that case is:
> 
>  <bb 14>:
>   pretmp_176 = *prephitmp_173;
>   goto <bb 13>;
> 
> the statement here is generated in pre pass.
> 
> For vectorization to work we can either not generate it in pre or move it
> into head of the loop in vectorizer.
> 
> Right now i'm trying to find how to prevent pre from generating statements
> in empty latch blocks.

It already has code to avoid this in some situations.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-26  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-57223-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-05-09  5:06 ` snagavallis at outlook dot com
2013-05-09  5:11 ` snagavallis at outlook dot com
2013-09-26  8:45 ` y.usishchev at samsung dot com
2013-09-26  9:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-09-26 14:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-26 14:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-26 14:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-57223-4-ctgSaImhi0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).