From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29237 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2014 20:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29193 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2014 20:41:26 -0000 From: "sutambe at yahoo dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57248] string parameter to constexpr functions Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sutambe at yahoo dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57248 --- Comment #8 from Sumant Tambe --- Bummer! My assumption/expectation (probably due to my ignorance) is that any transformation/result obtained using a constexpr function should be usable (perhaps recursively) in the caller constexpr function. How does the recursive strmatch function work then?