From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31563 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2014 20:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31524 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2014 20:47:27 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57248] string parameter to constexpr functions Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:47:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57248 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Sumant Tambe from comment #8) > How does the recursive strmatch function work then? It works, because the function implementation does not contain any expressi= on that would depend on being a constant expression. And it would be perfectly fine to invoke this function with non-constant arguments. From begin with it was an important design decision that constexpr functions can always be cal= led like any other function. >>From gcc-bugs-return-463240-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 03 21:28:53 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19328 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2014 21:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19264 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2014 21:28:48 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/23684] Combine stores for non strict alignment targets Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 21:28:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 Content-length: 443 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23684 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carrot at google dot com --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 63447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***