From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-422511-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10350 invoked by alias); 17 May 2013 10:04:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10324 invoked by uid 48); 17 May 2013 10:04:12 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/57311] New: Conversion operator can be overloaded with itself by using typedef
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-57311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg01184.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57311

            Bug ID: 57311
           Summary: Conversion operator can be overloaded with itself by
                    using typedef
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This should be rejected:


typedef int Int;

template<class T, class U> struct is_same       { enum { value = 0 }; };
template<class T>          struct is_same<T, T> { enum { value = 1 }; };

struct X
{
    operator int() const { return 0; }
    operator Int() const { return 0; }
};

static_assert( is_same<Int, int>::value, "Int is int" );