From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23452 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2013 20:59:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23421 invoked by uid 48); 13 Nov 2013 20:59:24 -0000 From: "uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01293.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 Ulrich Weigand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand --- Hi Adhemerval, I'm also seeing that this patch fixes some glibc failures. What's the status of this? Were you planning to submit it for inclusion? B.t.w. I'm wondering if we don't need to use + if (fabs (z) != inf()) + return z; instead; z could still be minus infinity, right?