public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/57379] New: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 @ 2013-05-22 19:42 ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-22 22:11 ` [Bug target/57379] " ubizjak at gmail dot com ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-22 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57379 Bug ID: 57379 Summary: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ubizjak at gmail dot com Target: alpha-linux-gnu Created attachment 30167 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30167&action=edit Preprocessed source This is recent regression. The segfault can be triggered with crosscompiler to alpha-linux-gnu, configured with: "../gcc-svn/trunk/configure --target=alpha-linux-gnu --with-long-double-128" $ ~/gcc-build-alpha/gcc/cc1 -O2 -fpreprocessed -quiet libgcc2.i -o libgcc2.s ../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function ‘__multc3’: ../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1927:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0x8a5c0f crash_signal ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:333 0x6fa870 invalidate_any_buried_refs ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 0x6fa924 invalidate_any_buried_refs ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 0x6fa924 invalidate_any_buried_refs ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 gdb session: (gdb) r Starting program: /home/uros/gcc-build-alpha/gcc/cc1 -O2 -fpreprocessed -quiet libgcc2.i -o libgcc2.s Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 3850 if (MEM_P (x) && simple_mem (x)) (gdb) b #0 invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 #1 0x00000000006fa925 in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x7ffff1884690) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 #2 0x00000000006fa925 in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x7ffff1884678) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 #3 0x00000000006fa925 in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=x@entry=0x7ffff1884660) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 #4 0x00000000006fb4c2 in compute_ld_motion_mems () at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3922 #5 one_pre_gcse_pass () at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:2679 #6 execute_rtl_pre () at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:4119 #7 0x00000000008033f0 in execute_one_pass (pass=pass@entry=0x10765c0 <pass_rtl_pre>) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/passes.c:2337 #8 0x0000000000803855 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x10765c0 <pass_rtl_pre>) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/passes.c:2389 ... (gdb) f 1 #1 0x00000000006fa925 in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x7ffff1884690) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3862 3862 invalidate_any_buried_refs (XEXP (x, i)); (gdb) p debug_rtx (x) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg/v:TF 70 [ x ]) (nil)) $1 = void (gdb) f 4 #4 0x00000000006fb4c2 in compute_ld_motion_mems () at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3922 3922 invalidate_any_buried_refs (src_eq); (gdb) p debug_rtx (src_eq) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (symbol_ref:DI ("_OtsEqlX") [flags 0x41]) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg/v:TF 70 [ x ]) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg/v:TF 70 [ x ]) (nil)))) $2 = void (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn) (insn 65 64 66 2 (set (reg:DI 148) (reg:DI 0 $0)) ../../../gcc-svn/trunk/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1882 226 {*movdi} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 0 $0) (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (symbol_ref:DI ("_OtsEqlX") [flags 0x41]) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg/v:TF 70 [ x ]) (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg/v:TF 70 [ x ]) (nil)))) (nil)))) $3 = void It looks like recursion doesn't check for NULL_RTX when processing expr_list. >From gcc-bugs-return-422920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 22 20:17:49 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-422920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29421 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 20:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29394 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2013 20:17:45 -0000 From: "fabien at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 20:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fabien at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: <bug-37140-4-BAJi0UxEkS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-37140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-37140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg01593.txt.bz2 Content-length: 525 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id7140 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #4) > PR14258 is fixed and this is still rejected. Maybe Fabien wants to have a > look?!? Sure, I'll have a look. Thank you Paolo! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/57379] [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 2013-05-22 19:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/57379] New: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-22 22:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-23 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-10 18:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-22 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57379 Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|rtl-optimization |target --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- Target issue, a very strange equal note is attached to the result of TFmode xfloating compare. I am testing following patch: --cut here-- Index: alpha.c =================================================================== --- alpha.c (revision 199214) +++ alpha.c (working copy) @@ -3067,12 +3067,8 @@ alpha_emit_xfloating_compare (enum rtx_code *pcode operands[1] = op1; out = gen_reg_rtx (DImode); - /* What's actually returned is -1,0,1, not a proper boolean value, - so use an EXPR_LIST as with a generic libcall instead of a - comparison type expression. */ - note = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, op1, NULL_RTX); - note = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, op0, note); - note = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, func, note); + /* What's actually returned is -1,0,1, not a proper boolean value. */ + note = gen_rtx_UNSPEC (DImode, gen_rtvec (2, op0, op1), UNSPEC_COMPARE); alpha_emit_xfloating_libcall (func, out, operands, 2, note); return out; Index: alpha.md =================================================================== --- alpha.md (revision 199214) +++ alpha.md (working copy) @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ ;; Uses of UNSPEC in this file: (define_c_enum "unspec" [ + UNSPEC_COMPARE UNSPEC_ARG_HOME UNSPEC_LDGP1 UNSPEC_INSXH --cut here-- >From gcc-bugs-return-422929-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed May 22 22:46:54 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-422929-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1886 invoked by alias); 22 May 2013 22:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1864 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2013 22:46:51 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57352] internal compiler error in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse at cp/parser.c:22878 Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 22:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution target_milestone Message-ID: <bug-57352-4-ceI6oNSMDF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-57352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-57352-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg01602.txt.bz2 Content-length: 500 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idW352 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> --- Fixed for 4.9.0. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/57379] [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 2013-05-22 19:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/57379] New: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-22 22:11 ` [Bug target/57379] " ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2013-05-23 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-10 18:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-05-23 8:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57379 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/57379] [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 2013-05-22 19:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/57379] New: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-22 22:11 ` [Bug target/57379] " ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-23 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-10 18:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2013-06-10 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57379 Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.7.4 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- Fixed in mainline and backported to 4.8.1 and 4.7.4 branches. >From gcc-bugs-return-424128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jun 10 18:52:10 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-424128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20941 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2013 18:52:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20882 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jun 2013 18:52:00 -0000 From: "anass.lasram at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57575] lvalue function accepted as an rvalue Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anass.lasram at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: <bug-57575-4-5XDwmwnRh1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-57575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-57575-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1100 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57575 Anass Lasram <anass.lasram at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Anass Lasram <anass.lasram at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) > Your assumptions are mistaken. In C++ it is valid to bind a function value > to an rvalue reference of that function type. It is only so, that binding to > an lvalue reference is preferred. > > In other words, the following is valid as well: > > float f() { return 0.f; } > float (&&r)(void) = f; > > See for example [over.ics.ref] p3 (emphasis mine): > > "Except for an implicit object parameter, for which see 13.3.1, a standard > conversion sequence cannot be formed if it requires [..] binding an rvalue > reference to an lvalue **other than a function lvalue**." Thanks Daniel for the rectification. >From gcc-bugs-return-424129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jun 10 19:19:51 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-424129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4360 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2013 19:19:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3599 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jun 2013 19:19:43 -0000 From: "drussel at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/57580] New: Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: drussel at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: <bug-57580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 Content-length: 831 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 Bug ID: 57580 Summary: Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: drussel at gmail dot com Input: #define BROKEN \ _Pragma("message(\"message0\")") \ _Pragma("message(\"message1\")") BROKEN Output: gcc -c test.cpp test.cpp:5:2: error: stray ‘#’ in program test.cpp:5:27: note: #pragma message: message0 test.cpp:5:3: error: ‘pragma’ does not name a type gcc 4.6.3 and clang are both happy with the code. >From gcc-bugs-return-424130-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Jun 10 19:34:21 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-424130-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20639 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2013 19:34:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20582 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jun 2013 19:34:16 -0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/57551] [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: regression X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: <bug-57551-4-heth2LosGW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-57551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-57551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 Content-length: 437 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idW551 Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Reassigning since Honza has been working on this. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-10 18:46 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-05-22 19:42 [Bug rtl-optimization/57379] New: [4.9 Regression]: Segfault in invalidate_any_buried_refs (x=0x0) at ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/gcse.c:3850 ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-22 22:11 ` [Bug target/57379] " ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-05-23 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-10 18:46 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).