From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30096 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2013 16:03:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30059 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2013 16:03:02 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/57505] [C++11] destructor of std::function should be noexcept Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57505 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- This is fixed in gcc 4.9 trunk and I believe it has already been fixed in g= cc 4.8 due to bug #50043. >>From gcc-bugs-return-423677-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Jun 02 17:32:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2956 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2013 17:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2911 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2013 17:32:45 -0000 From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/57503] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Expand uses wrong multiply routine Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Content-length: 642 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503 --- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 30245 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30245&action=edit cecky2.c: More test case (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > I thought this was fixed for 4.8 by bug 54295. My 4.8 is dated some days before the release candidate, around 2013-03-06. If I understand correctly, that 4.8.0 (experimental) contains the fix for PR54295 but still generates wrong code? And I don't see a backport to 4.7. Thus the fix for PR54295 is not complete, or this is an other, unrelated problem.