From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-423809-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10873 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2013 18:07:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10832 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jun 2013 18:06:55 -0000
From: "jewillco at osl dot iu.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/57528] New: Missed warning for putting reference to temporary in class member
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 18:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter
Message-ID: <bug-57528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57528

            Bug ID: 57528
           Summary: Missed warning for putting reference to temporary in
                    class member
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jewillco at osl dot iu.edu

It would be nice to have a warning on code such as:

struct b {
  const int& r;
  b(int r): r(r) {}
};

that is almost certainly unintended since it always binds a reference to a
temporary in a case where the reference outlives the temporary.  "g++ (GCC)
4.9.0 20130519 (experimental)" does not warn on this code with -Wall -Wextra,
whether with -O2 or without.  Uses of the struct b (including with a literal
number as constructor argument) do not produce warnings either.