From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11309 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2013 20:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11216 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jun 2013 20:49:56 -0000 From: "schwab@linux-m68k.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/57583] large switches with jump tables are horribly broken on m68k Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: schwab@linux-m68k.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57583 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- The assembler already handles jump targets that are too far away (via the BROKEN_DOT_WORD hack), this issue is about growing the table itself too large so that the overflow table is not reachable any more within 32K.