From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-428112-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3062 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2013 13:07:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3046 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2013 13:07:23 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:07:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-57590-4-2OTiN7vpiK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-57590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-57590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg01036.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590

--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> I think in general it's ok to use the same class container type for all of
> them, but we should not fix the array spec of the _data component at compile
> time (but use something like AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE instead?).

In fact the following simple patch makes the test case produce the expected
output:


Index: gcc/fortran/class.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/class.c    (revision 201871)
+++ gcc/fortran/class.c    (working copy)
@@ -637,6 +637,8 @@ gfc_build_class_symbol (gfc_typespec *ts, symbol_a
       c->attr.codimension = attr->codimension;
       c->attr.abstract = fclass->attr.abstract;
       c->as = (*as);
+      if (c->as->type == AS_EXPLICIT)
+    c->as->type = AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE;
       c->initializer = NULL;

       /* Add component '_vptr'.  */


Will check if this survives a regtest.