public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
@ 2013-06-19 12:09 doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 12:16 ` [Bug driver/57651] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
Bug ID: 57651
Summary: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find
the lto plugin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org
$ gcc-ar-4.8 -h
gcc-ar-4.8: Cannot find plugin 'liblto_plugin.so'
the plugin is *not* installed with x permission flags (which seems to be the
standard for shared libraries). You did change the code to use find_a_file
which searches only for files with the x bit set.
Work around is to install the plugin with the x bits set, or use some helper
function which doesn't look for the x bits. I assume that wasn't catched,
because the plugin then was found in another location?
gcc.c has a static find_a_file function which does allows to specify the
permission flags you want to search for.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-19 12:16 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 15:13 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
now, working around the permission bit, I get:
$ gcc-ar-4.8
gcc-ar-4.8: Cannot find binary 'ar'
so it only searches ar in the given paths, not on the path of the file system
(/usr/bin in this case)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 12:16 ` [Bug driver/57651] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-19 15:13 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 15:14 ` meadori at codesourcery dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: doko at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose <doko at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
please lets fix it in gcc. I fixed it in gcc.c last year, and this behaviour
is now re-introduced, so it is a regression. shared libraries work without the
x bit set too, so lets just recognize these too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 12:16 ` [Bug driver/57651] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 15:13 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-19 15:14 ` meadori at codesourcery dot com
2013-06-19 15:16 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: meadori at codesourcery dot com @ 2013-06-19 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
--- Comment #4 from Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery dot com> ---
OK, I will look into it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-19 15:14 ` meadori at codesourcery dot com
@ 2013-06-19 15:16 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 16:08 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: meadori at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
meadori at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-19
CC| |meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-19 15:16 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-19 16:08 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: meadori at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
meadori at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|meadori at gcc dot gnu.org |doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from meadori at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Matthias, I see where you already have a proposed patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg01134.html
Assigning to you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug driver/57651] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-06-19 16:08 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-06-19 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-19 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57651
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 19 17:37:36 2013
New Revision: 200209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200209&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/57651
* gcc-ar.c (main): If not CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE, look for
PERSONALITY in $PATH derived prefixes.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/gcc-ar.c
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 19 17:39:20 2013
New Revision: 200210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/57651
* gcc-ar.c (main): If not CROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE, look for
PERSONALITY in $PATH derived prefixes.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/gcc-ar.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-19 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-19 12:09 [Bug driver/57651] New: [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] gcc-ar and gcc-nm don't find the lto plugin doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 12:16 ` [Bug driver/57651] " doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 15:13 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 15:14 ` meadori at codesourcery dot com
2013-06-19 15:16 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 16:08 ` meadori at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-06-19 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).