From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11096 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2013 15:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11002 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jun 2013 15:25:19 -0000 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/57660] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop1 "Replaced" 8 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01107.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57660 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at redhat dot com Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |law at redhat dot com Summary|[4.9 regression] FAIL: |FAIL: |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28 |gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28 |.c scan-tree-dump-times |.c scan-tree-dump-times |forwprop1 "Replaced" 8 |forwprop1 "Replaced" 8 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Not a regression as it's a new test. Odds are other targets with similar branch cost characteristics are going to see this new failure as well. Mine.