From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21702 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2013 12:50:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21681 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2013 12:50:16 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57746] rejected valid specialization of member function of class template (I think) Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01849.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57746 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > It does for G++, it's been accepted as an extension in C++03 mode for yea= rs. What I actually meant to say with my comment is that for a proper bug report the category should be C++11, because the argumentation of the bug report w= as based on standard wording and not based on a gcc extension statement. There= fore my own validation (e.g. when referring to gcc 4.9) did all happen with using std=3Dc++11. >>From gcc-bugs-return-425471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Jun 30 13:48:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10846 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2013 13:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10806 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jun 2013 13:48:07 -0000 From: "mikpe at it dot uu.se" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57504] invalid this pointer passed in call to virtual function that returns a struct Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: mikpe at it dot uu.se X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01850.txt.bz2 Content-length: 502 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57504 Mikael Pettersson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson --- I can reproduce the wrong-code with gcc-4.7.2 targeting x86_64-w64-mingw32 -m32, but not with a similarly configured gcc-4.7.3.