[Bug c/57773] New: -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[Bug c/57773] New: -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[eggert at gnu dot org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773

            Bug ID: 57773
           Summary: -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: eggert at gnu dot org

Given this program in the file t.c:

  enum e { zero };
  struct { enum e field: 2; } s;

The command "gcc -Wpedantic -S t.c" outputs:

  t.c:2:15: warning: type of bit-field 'field' is a GCC extension [-Wpedantic]
  struct { enum e field: 2; } s;

This diagnostic should not be output.  -Wpedantic is supposed to
generate only diagnostics required by the standard.  But this
diagnostic is not required by C99 or by C11, since these standards
allow this GCC extension and do not require a diagnostic if the
extension is used.  And the diagnostic is not required by C89 since no
constraint is violated.

[Bug c/57773] -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-07-05
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yeah, I think you're right.  Confirmed.

[Bug c/57773] -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After all, I think it'd be wise to keep the warning for ISO C, but turn if off
for C99/C11.  I have a patch for that.

[Bug c/57773] -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jan  6 18:53:01 2014
New Revision: 206373

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR c/57773
    * doc/implement-c.texi: Mention that other integer types are
    permitted as bit-field types in strictly conforming mode.
c/
    * c-decl.c (check_bitfield_type_and_width): Warn for implementation
    defined bit-field types only in ISO C.
testsuite/
    * gcc.dg/pr57773.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr57773.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c/c-decl.c
    trunk/gcc/doc/implement-c.texi
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug c/57773] -Wpedantic incorrect warning for enum bit-field

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.