[Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 "override" keyword

["manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57854

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0)
> I would like a new (optional) warning that would point out every C++ virtual
> override that is done without the C++11 keyword that indicates an override.
> By necessity, this warning would only be permitted in C++11 mode.

Hi Thiago,

I am so grateful for KDE that I would like to help here if possible. But I
would like to ask the C++ maintainer whether this is something that would be
accepted in mainline G++ and whether G++ has the capabilities to detect this
easily. Jason, what do you think?

Perhaps the same issues that made [[base_check]] to be dropped would affect the
implementation of this warning? I don't know the specifics.
>From gcc-bugs-return-426003-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jul 09 09:29:07 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426003-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 834 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 653 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:04 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-54366-4-Ihocz9UfAZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-54366-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-54366-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2
Content-length: 472

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idT366

Bug 54366 depends on bug 51786, which changed state.

Bug 51786 Summary: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idQ786

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED