From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2159 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2128 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:41 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57854] Would like to have a warning for virtual overrides without C++11 "override" keyword Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57854 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org, | |manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #0) > I would like a new (optional) warning that would point out every C++ virt= ual > override that is done without the C++11 keyword that indicates an overrid= e. > By necessity, this warning would only be permitted in C++11 mode. Hi Thiago, I am so grateful for KDE that I would like to help here if possible. But I would like to ask the C++ maintainer whether this is something that would be accepted in mainline G++ and whether G++ has the capabilities to detect this easily. Jason, what do you think? Perhaps the same issues that made [[base_check]] to be dropped would affect= the implementation of this warning? I don't know the specifics. >>From gcc-bugs-return-426003-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jul 09 09:29:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 834 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 653 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2013 09:29:04 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: meta-bug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 Content-length: 472 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 51786, which changed state. Bug 51786 Summary: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED