From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D8E5A386F02A; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:53:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D8E5A386F02A From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/57871] gfortran -freal-4-real-16 gives wrong result for selected_real_kind(1) Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:53:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:53:32 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57871 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > Note that after r11-7501 the test in comment O gives cat run time: > % gfc pr57871.f90 -freal-4-real-16 That issue is now fixed =E2=80=93 see PR fortran/99355 for some details. I also updated the documentation to fill some gaps in the -freal-4-real-16 etc. descriptions and added another caveat. See commit or https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Fortran-Dialect-Options.html#index-= freal-4-real-16 (may take a day to get updated). As this issue is about documentation, if I read the later comments correctl= y: Can you check whether the documentation is now sufficient or whether more is needed? If so, what is needed? =E2=80=94 If not, can this bug now be closed= ?=