From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-438306-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2225 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2013 21:58:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2137 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2013 21:58:46 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) "invokes undefined behavior" warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-57904-4-XXGhUq8nMK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-57904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-57904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01961.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904

--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> For the FE change, I guess most important are benchmark results, 
> doesn't it slow down important benchmarks?

AFAICT the answer is not at least for the gfortran test suite and the
polyhedron ones
(pb05, pb11, and my own variants).

May be Joost can do more testing for CP2K.