public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization @ 2013-07-18 20:20 mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com 2013-07-18 23:59 ` [Bug c++/57930] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com @ 2013-07-18 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Bug ID: 57930 Summary: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com In the example below, a subobject of type B is constructed but not destructed when an exception is thrown during construction of the enclosing object of type A after subobject of type B has been constructed. extern "C" int printf(const char *,...); struct B { B(int,int) { printf("CB %p\n",this); } B(const B&) { printf("const CB %pn\n",this); } B(B&&) { printf("const CB %pn\n",this); } ~B() { printf("B %p\n",this); } }; struct C { int c; int c2; }; struct A { struct B b; struct C c; }; A test() { //const A a1 = { { 1, 2 }, { 3, (throw 9, 4) } } ; // destructor for B called //const A &a2 = { { 1, 2 }, { 3, (throw 9, 4) } } ; // destructor for B not called return { { 1, 2 }, { 3, (throw 9, 4) } } ; // destructor for B not called }; int main() { try { test(); } catch (...) { } } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization 2013-07-18 20:20 [Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com @ 2013-07-18 23:59 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-07-22 10:15 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-07-22 10:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-18 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm pretty sure there's an existing bug report about this, opened by Jason. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization 2013-07-18 20:20 [Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com 2013-07-18 23:59 ` [Bug c++/57930] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-22 10:15 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-07-22 10:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-22 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> --- Maybe we have another one too, but isn't this PR57510? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization 2013-07-18 20:20 [Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com 2013-07-18 23:59 ` [Bug c++/57930] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-07-22 10:15 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-22 10:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-07-22 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yes, that's probably the one I'm thinking of. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57510 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-22 10:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-07-18 20:20 [Bug c++/57930] New: missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization mmehlich at semanticdesigns dot com 2013-07-18 23:59 ` [Bug c++/57930] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-07-22 10:15 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-07-22 10:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).