public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions
@ 2013-07-25 0:05 lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/57976] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au @ 2013-07-25 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
Bug ID: 57976
Summary: Missing time_get<>::get() functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
The standard facet time_get<> is missing the get() functions.
According to the GCC 4.7 C++11 Implementation Status, Section 22.4.5.1 of the
standard library is completely implemented. However, the time_get<>::get()
functions are missing therefore it isn't complete.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/57976] Missing time_get<>::get() functions
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
@ 2013-07-25 0:16 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:22 ` lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
The status page needs a tweak: it's well known that isn't implemented, for the
simple reason that completing the C++11 time_get means adding the do_get
virtual, which didn't exist in C++98, and doing that breaks the ABI.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/57976] Missing time_get<>::get() functions
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/57976] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-07-25 0:22 ` lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au @ 2013-07-25 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
--- Comment #2 from Leo Carreon <lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au> ---
Is there a plan to implement those functions? If yes, in which version?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/57976] Missing time_get<>::get() functions
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/57976] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:22 ` lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
@ 2013-07-25 0:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
When we break the ABI. Likely in the release series after 4.9.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/57976] Missing time_get<>::get() functions
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-07-25 0:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-07-25 0:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Same issue, really.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54354 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/57976] Missing time_get<>::get() functions
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-07-25 0:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2013-07-25 0:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2013-07-25 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57976
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
I have adjusted status_cxx2011.xml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-25 0:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-07-25 0:05 [Bug libstdc++/57976] New: Missing time_get<>::get() functions lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:16 ` [Bug libstdc++/57976] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:22 ` lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au
2013-07-25 0:23 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:24 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2013-07-25 0:47 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).