[Bug fortran/57987] Fortran finalizers considered extern-inline by middle-end

["burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57987

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Comment on attachment 30558
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30558
An unsuccessful attempt to fix this

>+      if (!has_coarray_vars || gfc_option.coarray == GFC_FCOARRAY_LIB)
>+	(void) cgraph_create_node (fndecl);

It seems to work if I change the condition to:
                              || gfc_option.coarray != GFC_FCOARRAY_LIB)
which matches the comment and looks more reasonable.

(Don't ask me why the normal !(a && b != c) -> (!a || b == c) doesn't work.
It's to hot to think about it.)
>From gcc-bugs-return-426764-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 26 12:20:53 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-426764-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4199 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2013 12:20:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4113 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jul 2013 12:20:50 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/57974] std::pow(std::complex<long double>(0),1) returns  (-nan,-nan)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:20:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-57974-4-b9JMNuHY26@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-57974-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-57974-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg01271.txt.bz2
Content-length: 485

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idW974

--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Also, in practice, I think it's *very* hard to explain to the users why long
double is so special, why the middle-end can't handle it in complete analogy
with float and double. And since clang and icc are *already* doing it,
apparently, you can't just tell them, vaguely, "it's very tough to implement"
or "performance would be horrible" or something similar.