* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-09-21 15:13 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-09-21 16:15 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-09-21 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on
hppa64-hp-hpux11.11?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-21 15:13 ` [Bug libfortran/58015] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-09-21 16:15 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2013-09-27 14:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2013-09-21 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 21-Sep-13, at 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on
> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11?
Don't know. It looks like libquadmath has nextafter, so it may be
possible
to fix this.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-21 15:13 ` [Bug libfortran/58015] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-09-21 16:15 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2013-09-27 14:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2013-12-13 22:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2013-09-27 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 9/21/2013 11:13 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Is this PR different from pr58113 beside the missing nextafterl on
> hppa64-hp-hpux11.11?
I hacked c99_functions.c to provide nextafterl using nextafterq from
libquadmath. With
this, I see the bug in pr58113.
Regarding nextafterl, I'm thinking about an include hack to math.h for
hppa*-*-hpux11*.
On all HP-UX systems, the "l" and "q" long double and quad math
functions are equivalent.
Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-27 14:16 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2013-12-13 22:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-15 18:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-13 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why not just adapt the existing implementation of nextafterf to long double?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-13 22:08 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-15 18:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2014-02-25 9:28 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2013-12-15 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 13-Dec-13, at 5:08 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
>
> --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Why not just adapt the existing implementation of nextafterf to long
> double?
This requires frexpl and scalbnl which also don't currently exist.
They have further dependencies.
What did work was a simple routine to call nextafterq in libquadmath.
Quad and long double
are equivalent on hppa.
Then I thought I should create a long double port of libquadmath and
integrate it into libgcc on hppa.
However, I haven't had time to complete this approach but it would
provide a complete set of c99 long
double functions.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-15 18:55 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
@ 2014-02-25 9:28 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-24 0:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-02-25 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Feb 25 09:27:25 2014
New Revision: 208114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Skip gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 and gfortran.dg/round_4.f90 on Solaris 9 (PR
libfortran/59313, libfortran/58015)
PR libfortran/59313
* gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90: Skip on sparc*-*-solaris2.9*.
PR libfortran/58015
* gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Skip on *-*-solaris2.9*.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_4.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-25 9:28 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-24 0:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-07 10:54 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-24 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Mar 24 00:32:41 2014
New Revision: 208781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/59313
PR libfortran/58015
* gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90: Skip on hppa*-*-hpux*.
* gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/round_4.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-24 0:33 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-07 10:54 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-22 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.0 has been released
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [Bug libfortran/58015] FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl"
2013-07-28 17:21 [Bug libfortran/58015] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/round_4.f90: Unsatisfied symbol "nextafterl" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-07 10:54 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-07 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58015
Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think we want to provide a full long double fallback libc as part of
gfortran. So, I'll close this as WONTFIX: the testcases have been XFAIL'ed, and
the proper course now is to for those targets to provide a full libc, or for
users not to rely on long double types in the meantime.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread