public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "freget at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/58056] New: ld segfaults when "-undefined dynamic_lookup" is set Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:11:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-58056-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58056 Bug ID: 58056 Summary: ld segfaults when "-undefined dynamic_lookup" is set Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: freget at googlemail dot com Created attachment 30588 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30588&action=edit Object file causing the error I'm using g++ 4.8.1 on OS X with the following configuration: Ziel: x86_64-apple-darwin12.4.0 Konfiguriert mit: ../configure --build=x86_64-apple-darwin12.4.0 --prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc48/4.8.1/gcc --datarootdir=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc48/4.8.1/share --bindir=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc48/4.8.1/bin --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java,objc,obj-c++ --program-suffix=-4.8 --with-gmp=/usr/local/opt/gmp --with-mpfr=/usr/local/opt/mpfr --with-mpc=/usr/local/opt/libmpc --with-cloog=/usr/local/opt/cloog --with-isl=/usr/local/opt/isl --with-system-zlib --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-stage1-checking --enable-checking=release --enable-lto --disable-werror --enable-plugin --with-ecj-jar=/usr/local/opt/ecj/share/java/ecj.jar --disable-multilib Thread-Modell: posix gcc-Version 4.8.1 (GCC) Using the (faulty) object file attached, the following call causes a segfault: > g++-4.8 -std=c++0x -g -dynamiclib -undefined dynamic_lookup -o output.dylib Notifications.cpp.o collect2: Fehler: ld mit Signal 11 [Segmentation fault: 11] beendet However, once I link without "-undefined dynamic_lookup", I get a meaningful error description: > g++-4.8 -std=c++0x -g -dynamiclib -o output.dylib Notifications.cpp.o Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomOutputBuffer::~CustomOutputBuffer()", referenced from: libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomWarnBuffer::~CustomWarnBuffer() in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomErrBuffer::~CustomErrBuffer() in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomPrintBuffer::~CustomPrintBuffer() in Notifications.cpp.o "vtable for libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomOutputBuffer", referenced from: libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomOutputBuffer::CustomOutputBuffer(unsigned long) in Notifications.cpp.o NOTE: a missing vtable usually means the first non-inline virtual member function has no definition. "_elog_finish", referenced from: libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomPrintBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomErrBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomWarnBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::DefaultHandler(char const*, char const*, char const*, int) in Notifications.cpp.o "_elog_start", referenced from: libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomPrintBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomErrBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::CustomWarnBuffer::printToUser(char*) in Notifications.cpp.o libsoda::(anonymous namespace)::DefaultHandler(char const*, char const*, char const*, int) in Notifications.cpp.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64 collect2: Fehler: ld gab 1 als Ende-Status zurück This is something I can work with. Debugging with the only output beeing a segfault is not that easy. Not that the example above was stripped down as much as possible and will never compile successfully in this configuration. >From gcc-bugs-return-427165-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Aug 02 08:25:58 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-427165-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1581 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2013 08:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1464 invoked by uid 48); 2 Aug 2013 08:25:54 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/58048] [4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-58048-4-Hk0k3AyZHb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-58048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-58048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 Content-length: 360 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58048 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Note that with -O0: > d.c: In function ‘div3’: > d.c:102:3: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an ‘asm’ Just replace 32 with 32.0 as the asm operand. >From gcc-bugs-return-427166-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Aug 02 08:34:25 2013 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-427166-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14673 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2013 08:34:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14611 invoked by uid 48); 2 Aug 2013 08:34:23 -0000 From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/58048] [4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-58048-4-ht6eWvkVkO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-58048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-58048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00090.txt.bz2 Content-length: 375 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX048 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Right, thanks, but then the ICE doesn't occur, so this makes it pretty much ICE on invalid. Reduced nevertheless... void div3 (void) { double tmp1; asm volatile ("fscale":"=t" (tmp1):"0" (0), "u" (0)); } (with sed 's/(0/(0.0/g' the ICE's gone)
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-02 8:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-08-02 8:11 freget at googlemail dot com [this message] 2013-08-02 8:45 ` [Bug c++/58056] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-08-02 13:50 ` [Bug other/58056] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-58056-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).