[Bug c/58092] BEQ (Branch on equal) jumps to wrong address (executes conditional code!)

["zajec5 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58092

--- Comment #1 from Rafał Miłecki <zajec5 at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 30618
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30618&action=edit
Compiled version of test.c

Command I use to compile test.c:

mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc \
-I arch/mips/include \
-I arch/mips/include/generated \
-I arch/mips/include/asm/mach-bcm47xx \
-I arch/mips/include/asm/mach-generic \
-I include  \
-include include/linux/kconfig.h \
-D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE \
-Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security
-Wframe-larger-than=1024 -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign \
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
-fno-caller-saves -fno-stack-protector -fno-pic -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
-femit-struct-debug-baseonly -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack \
-mno-check-zero-division -mno-abicalls -mno-branch-likely -msoft-float
-mno-long-calls -ffreestanding -mabi=32 -march=mips32 -Wa,-mips32 -Wa,--trap \
-D CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO \
-Os \
-c -o test.o test.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-427430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Aug 06 12:12:17 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-427430-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10434 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2013 12:12:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10332 invoked by uid 48); 6 Aug 2013 12:12:12 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58091] Non-ambiguous member lookup rejected
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:12:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58091-4-HQGaiI9ng5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2
Content-length: 359

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX091

--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Generally speaking, this is a basic C++ issue, doesn't have to do with the
recent constexpr, and normally icc is very solid about those. Remember there
are also DRs, besides the published Standards. At the moment, I simply don't
know.