public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/58099] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [F03] over-zealous procedure-pointer error checking
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58099-4-EBX8r5ihYL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-58099-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099

--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Sep 20 07:44:05 2013
New Revision: 202766

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202766&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-20  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/58099
    * expr.c (gfc_check_pointer_assign): Remove second call to
    'gfc_compare_interfaces' with swapped arguments.
    * interface.c (gfc_compare_interfaces): Symmetrize the call to
    'check_result_characteristics' by calling it with swapped arguments.

2013-09-20  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/58099
    * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_43.f90: New.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_43.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-20  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07  6:12 [Bug fortran/58099] New: over-zealous Error pointer error checking in gfortran 4.8 daniel.price at monash dot edu
2013-08-07  6:14 ` [Bug fortran/58099] " daniel.price at monash dot edu
2013-08-07  8:48 ` andy at gwentswordclub dot co.uk
2013-08-07  9:03 ` [Bug fortran/58099] [F03] over-zealous procedure " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-07  9:13 ` andy at gwentswordclub dot co.uk
2013-08-07  9:26 ` [Bug fortran/58099] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [F03] over-zealous procedure-pointer error checking janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-07  9:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-07 12:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-08  7:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-08  7:42 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-10 12:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-16 15:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20  6:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20  7:44 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-09-20  8:25 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20  8:28 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20  9:13 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20 10:38 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-20 10:44 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-16  9:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-17  6:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-16 23:13 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-17 12:14 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-17 13:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-02 22:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-03 23:03 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-08 21:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-08 21:42 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-08 23:56 ` daniel.price at monash dot edu
2013-12-09 23:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-58099-4-EBX8r5ihYL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).