From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-430249-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15960 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2013 10:38:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15911 invoked by uid 48); 20 Sep 2013 10:38:05 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/58099] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [F03] over-zealous procedure-pointer error checking
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58099-4-KGUyYfJn83@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58099-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58099-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01489.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099

--- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #18)
> This is avoided by the following improved patch (which just 'silently' sets
> the attributes):

That version still yields a good number of testsuite failures, but it seems
like most of them are due to invalid code that was not detected previously:

FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_decl_9.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_1.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_11.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_12.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_15.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_6.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_common_1.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90  -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_2.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_8.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_proc.f90  -O  (test for excess errors)

So for now I'm assuming the patch is fine. I will go through the above list in
detail and update the test cases accordingly.