public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/58100] Spurious "DO loop at (1) will be executed zero times" warning
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58100-4-cQJOv4EGaH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-58100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58100

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Still present after r201658 (pr56666, after it -Wall is needed).

With that patch, -W(no-)zerotrip permits to toggle the warning, which I think
it sufficient. Everything else requires more analysis (e.g. the "if"'s else
branch is never executed in this case), which I believe is not worthwhile.

Roland: Is the new warning option -W(no-)zerotrip sufficient for you?

(Side remark: there are conflicts with early optimization: For debugging, no
folding/simplification should be done by front-ends. On the other hand, some
simplification is useful - and the ME is too late for it.]


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-18 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07  9:31 [Bug fortran/58100] New: " roland.kaufmann at uni dot no
2013-08-13 14:47 ` [Bug fortran/58100] " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-08-17 22:22 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-18 20:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-08-22  8:23 ` roland.kaufmann at uni dot no
2013-08-28 13:57 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-58100-4-cQJOv4EGaH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).