From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 494 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2013 20:24:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 461 invoked by uid 48); 17 Aug 2013 20:24:02 -0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/58127] [4.9 Regression] 37 failures in gcc.dg/tree-prof/ for x86_64-apple-darwin10 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:24:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58127 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4) > The secret plan was to not use TLS for emutls. OK - I'll take a look at what should be used for the test... > There seems to be macro USE_EMUTLS specifying if we have real TLS or emuTLS. > > I am not sure what of the two tests passes. Perhaps it will help to replace > #ifdef HAVE_CC_TLS > __thread > #endif > #if defined(HAVE_CC_TLS) && !defined (USE_EMUTLS) > __thread > #endif ... seems plausible, will try it on my next build cycle. BTW, I wonder what it would take to make it work with emutls?