From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-427745-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26854 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2013 21:34:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26831 invoked by uid 48); 12 Aug 2013 21:34:21 -0000
From: "sven.koehler at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/58133] GCC should emit arm assembly following the unified syntax
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 21:34:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sven.koehler at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58133-4-ZWU5KveUeU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00669.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58133

--- Comment #1 from Sven <sven.koehler at gmail dot com> ---
It seems, that for targets like -mcpu=cortex-m4 the gcc does generate unified
syntax. So is the unified syntax only used for newer targets that use the
thumb2 instruction set whereas the divided syntax is used for older thumb1
targets?