From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-470741-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9703 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2014 14:30:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9661 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2014 14:30:07 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58192] G++ emits incorrect code when passing enum classes as function parameters
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:30:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-58192-4-MAJ571fUpZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01748.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D58192

Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org            |hjl.tools at gmail =
dot com,
                   |                            |ubizjak at gmail dot com

--- Comment #11 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Does this still fail after r218720, AKA PR64037 [1]?

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01183.html
>>From gcc-bugs-return-470742-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Dec 15 14:40:45 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-470742-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16478 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2014 14:40:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16436 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2014 14:40:41 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/64312] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-64312-4-hFhiImKPWJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64312-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg01749.txt.bz2
Content-length: 455

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64312

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.