From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-428293-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3510 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2013 12:25:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3484 invoked by uid 48); 23 Aug 2013 12:25:32 -0000
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug regression/58221] [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: regression
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc
Message-ID: <bug-58221-4-9tEOpNQ6oX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg01217.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-08-23
                 CC|                            |tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1)
> Maybe r201883 is the winner; checking.

Yes, that's it.  I'll have to leave for a few hours but I'll extract a small
test-case, probably just one of the regressions as-is.  CC to committer.
N.B. cris-* does not have target support for section-switching - at least I
don't remember putting in any specific support.

Regarding the patch, I can't say at a glance what could possibly be so damaging
about *not* skipping the first non-active insn.